Short Takes #3

1. For some Halloween fright, Clever Dude shows us what a truth about enzyte billion-dollar restaurant bill looks like.

2. Million Dollar Journey gives us a handy summary of planned TFSA (Tax-Free Savings Account) offerings from the major Canadian banks and brokerages.

3. Have you ever heard of a carry trade, but didn’t know what it was? Preet explains carry trades and the possible ramifications of Yen carry trades.

4. Blunt Money has some useful suggestions for getting out of cell phone contracts.

5. Canadian Capitalist reports on John Bogle’s stock market predictions. Don’t worry, though; they haven’t both lost their minds and started making predictions about short-term stock market movements. Now that stock prices have dropped significantly, Bogle thinks that returns over the next decade are likely to average 10% per year.
More on this topic (What's this?)
"Fears mount in Japan over complex yen products" (naked capitalism, 10/29/08)
Despite Fall in Yen, Risk for Emerging Markets Not Over (naked capitalism, 10/28/08)
Why the Yen and Dollar are Rallying (Blogging the Commodity Bull Market, 10/22/08)
Read more on Short Selling, Japanese Yen (JPY) at Wikinvest

Posted by Michael James at 12:01 AM 3 comments Links to this post

Labels: stock market, TFSA

Thursday, October 30, 2008
Property Tax Assessments

This week I got my notice from the government about how much they think my house is worth. They clearly didn’t spend much time on my house because my assessment went up by exactly the average amount in my area, 13%.

Fortunately, this doesn’t mean that my property taxes will go up by 13%. City governments don’t collect more taxes when property values rise and less when property values fall. What actually happens is the city decides on the total amount they will collect from homeowners, and then divides that amount among homeowners in proportion to assessed property values.

For example, if the city needs $1 billion from us, and the total value of all houses is $80 billion, then the tax rate is set at 1/80=1.25%. A house worth $320,000 would pay $4000 in property taxes. If property values had plummeted to a total of $50 billion, then the tax rate would have been set at 1/50=2%. The house that was worth $320,000 in good times is probably worth only $200,000 in bad times, but would still pay $4000 in property taxes (2% of $200,000).

With this type of system, what really matters to your property taxes is how much the value of your house rises compared to everyone else. Suppose that the city increases taxes by an average of 5% from last year to this year. My house’s assessed value went up by exactly the average amount, 13%. So, my tax increase will be 5%. If my assessment had gone up by 17%, then my taxes would have gone up by about 4% more than average, or about 9%.

One other wrinkle for my area is that new property values will be phased in over four years. This was done to reduce the shock for homeowners whose assessments changed dramatically. If no new assessments are done in the next four years, then I can look forward to paying exactly the average tax increase each year. If my assessment had gone up by 17% instead of the average 13%, then I could look forward to seeing my property taxes increase by about 1% more than the average for each of the next four years.
More on this topic (What's this?)
Tough Tax Talk As The Swiss Play It Cool (Asset Manager, 10/29/08)
Myth: US Corporations Have Among the Highest Tax Rates in the World (Fund my Mutual Fund, 10/15/08)
My House is worth 67% More (Canadian Personal Finance Blog, 10/30/08)
Read more on Property taxes, Taxation at Wikinvest